"I will stand again in Tanjong Pagar," said Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew at a National Day Dinner, as reported in the Straits Times yesterday (Sat, August 19/06). If MM Lee runs in Tanjong Pagar, he will win. And he will win more convincingly than his son did in Ang Mo Kio GRC. I wonder if that will cast his shadow even longer over PM Lee's regime.
"The trouble now is that Singaporeans believe we'll always have a PAP government," MM Lee also said. "One day they will wake up and they'll find the opposition is the government, a miscalculation." By then, it would be "too late to regret". Sigh. I was going to tackle this step by step, but I'll leave it till later. One interesting thing I did note was that the justification for upgrading has changed a little bit from the original, trite, "a party has the right to favour its own supporters" (commented on here). It is interesting to see how new arguments are woven everyday to justify old wrongs. It is also interesting to read how MM Lee said that "I hope in a quiet way, this message will be understood". Yes, residents of Hougang and Potong Pasir, make sure you suffer quietly. Don't disturb the peace and stability of the rest of us obedient PAP-fearing citizens.
PM Lee to deliver National Rally Speech tonight. I can't pay very close attention to it (more prelim papers tomorrow!) but one possible theme could be the consequences of globalization. Off the top of my head, here are some predictions: overseas Singaporeans, foreign talent, oil prices affecting all of us and hence the need to accept rising costs of living, the realization that the need to stay competitive will affect people from the lower income groups more, but that opportunities will be given, re-training, maybe a welfare scheme or two, same goes for older workers who find that their CPF is not enough, or those who struggle with healthcare costs. Also, the need to modernize our city to deal with global visitors e.g. the IMF and World Bank, or beyond that, tourists; the Integrated Resorts (which will provide much employment), perhaps something about speaking good English, the need to remain a stable society so as to attract investors, hence the need for law and order and a tight watch over racial sensibilities (esp. given the threat of terrorism and also the Israel-Lebanon crisis), however, the need to balance that with liberal and progressive thinking, people who know their minds and speak it, yet being mindful of their responsibilities (maybe blogs and journalists will get some sort of mention at this point). Also perhaps to balance globalization with the recognition that we are still very much our own sovereign nation and should only absorb the good stuff, not the bad, and to guard ourselves well from the shocks of globalization, and furthermore, to always see Singapore as our home in this big wide world no matter how globalized it is, and hence stay together while we move ahead, etcetera, etcetera.
Lao Xin Zhou September 9, 2006 07:53 PM PDT Wrong, John Soong.
Alternatives fuels such as hydrogenerator and wind enegy are not compatible to Singapore.
Biofuels, nuclears and solar powers are too expensive and not practical.
If we used these alternative fuels, the prices of now will increase 5 times.
Unless you use coal, which is cheaper than oil but produces large amount of air pollution.
The misery of now is not as worst as those people living in war torn countries like Lebanon. Or extremely poor countries like Cambodia and some African states.
john riemann soong August 21, 2006 07:07 PM PDT The government has the wrong mindset. While other entities look for alternatives to fossil fuel, the government places a yoke of "oil prices are rising, we can't do anything but to accept misery".
AC August 21, 2006 05:54 PM PDT Ya lor, cost of oil rising causes all prices to increase.
Last time government pay little to nothing (Lim Kim San, the grand architect of the HDB miracle, was at one time paid nothing) can build up Singapore and bring us from third world to first.
Nowadays need a million bucks just to find some honest people to keep Singapore afloat.
alex August 21, 2006 04:20 PM PDT Yeah! I definitely can't imagine the PAP out of power! My life would have lost its sense of purpose if the PAP's not around to run over every little aspects of my life.
Name August 21, 2006 02:23 PM PDT Thank God the PAP still rule over Singapore.
I can imagine living in a country that is not ruled by the PAP. I don't know how the other 4.641 billion people in the world ever make it through their life without the PAP. They must all be living in utter misery.
I think the happiness index thingy is rigged to discredit the Singapore govt. Singapore MUST be no. 1!!
LoveU August 20, 2006 10:53 PM PDT Oh it will be such a disaster if Singapore is not governed by the PAP govt. What if we elect a govt that is honest, transparent and work wholehearted for the people ....and is willing to take less than a million as minister's salary. ....that day will be the end of Singapore.
shameless advertising if you're looking for air compressors and ancillary parts (vane, rotary, screw, etc), my dad sells them! ;)
disclaimer the author of this site has based all her personal opinions on what is known to her as fact. any error is made of ignorance, not malice, and is accordingly apologized for. any views and opinions expressed by other persons on this site are not the responsibility of the author, nor does she claim to espouse them.