Sunday, August 20, 2006
Miscellaneous Thoughts

"I will stand again in Tanjong Pagar," said Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew at a National Day Dinner, as reported in the Straits Times yesterday (Sat, August 19/06).  If MM Lee runs in Tanjong Pagar, he will win.  And he will win more convincingly than his son did in Ang Mo Kio GRC.  I wonder if that will cast his shadow even longer over PM Lee's regime.

"The trouble now is that Singaporeans believe we'll always have a PAP government," MM Lee also said.  "One day they will wake up and they'll find the opposition is the government, a miscalculation." By then, it would be "too late to regret".  Sigh.  I was going to tackle this step by step, but I'll leave it till later.  One interesting thing I did note was that the justification for upgrading has changed a little bit from the original, trite, "a party has the right to favour its own supporters" (commented on here).  It is interesting to see how new arguments are woven everyday to justify old wrongs.  It is also interesting to read how MM Lee said that "I hope in a quiet way, this message will be understood".  Yes, residents of Hougang and Potong Pasir, make sure you suffer quietly.  Don't disturb the peace and stability of the rest of us obedient PAP-fearing citizens.

PM Lee to deliver National Rally Speech tonight.  I can't pay very close attention to it (more prelim papers tomorrow!) but one possible theme could be the consequences of globalization.  Off the top of my head, here are some predictions: overseas Singaporeans, foreign talent, oil prices affecting all of us and hence the need to accept rising costs of living, the realization that the need to stay competitive will affect people from the lower income groups more, but that opportunities will be given, re-training, maybe a welfare scheme or two, same goes for older workers who find that their CPF is not enough, or those who struggle with healthcare costs.  Also, the need to modernize our city to deal with global visitors e.g. the IMF and World Bank, or beyond that, tourists; the Integrated Resorts (which will provide much employment), perhaps something about speaking good English, the need to remain a stable society so as to attract investors, hence the need for law and order and a tight watch over racial sensibilities (esp. given the threat of terrorism and also the Israel-Lebanon crisis), however, the need to balance that with liberal and progressive thinking, people who know their minds and speak it, yet being mindful of their responsibilities (maybe blogs and journalists will get some sort of mention at this point).  Also perhaps to balance globalization with the recognition that we are still very much our own sovereign nation and should only absorb the good stuff, not the bad, and to guard ourselves well from the shocks of globalization, and furthermore, to always see Singapore as our home in this big wide world no matter how globalized it is, and hence stay together while we move ahead, etcetera, etcetera.

Posted at 06:30 pm by gaylegoh

Lao Xin Zhou
September 9, 2006   07:53 PM PDT
 
Wrong, John Soong.

Alternatives fuels such as hydrogenerator and wind enegy are not compatible to Singapore.

Biofuels, nuclears and solar powers are too expensive and not practical.

If we used these alternative fuels, the prices of now will increase 5 times.

Unless you use coal, which is cheaper than oil but produces large amount of air pollution.

The misery of now is not as worst as those people living in war torn countries like Lebanon. Or extremely poor countries like Cambodia and some African states.
john riemann soong
August 21, 2006   07:07 PM PDT
 
The government has the wrong mindset. While other entities look for alternatives to fossil fuel, the government places a yoke of "oil prices are rising, we can't do anything but to accept misery".
AC
August 21, 2006   05:54 PM PDT
 
Ya lor, cost of oil rising causes all prices to increase.

Last time government pay little to nothing (Lim Kim San, the grand architect of the HDB miracle, was at one time paid nothing) can build up Singapore and bring us from third world to first.

Nowadays need a million bucks just to find some honest people to keep Singapore afloat.
alex
August 21, 2006   04:20 PM PDT
 
Yeah! I definitely can't imagine the PAP out of power! My life would have lost its sense of purpose if the PAP's not around to run over every little aspects of my life.
Name
August 21, 2006   02:23 PM PDT
 
Thank God the PAP still rule over Singapore.

I can imagine living in a country that is not ruled by the PAP. I don't know how the other 4.641 billion people in the world ever make it through their life without the PAP. They must all be living in utter misery.

I think the happiness index thingy is rigged to discredit the Singapore govt. Singapore MUST be no. 1!!

LoveU
August 20, 2006   10:53 PM PDT
 
Oh it will be such a disaster if Singapore is not governed by the PAP govt. What if we elect a govt that is honest, transparent and work wholehearted for the people ....and is willing to take less than a million as minister's salary. ....that day will be the end of Singapore.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments







Previous Entry Home Next Entry
gayle goh

<< August 2006 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

profile

Recommended Posts

Do We Owe Our Existence to the PAP?
A Message From a Media Insider
The Bilahari Kausikan Post
Bilahari Kausikan's Reply
Money in Politics, Politics in Money
Workers' Party, PAP or My Living Room Armchair?
My Vision for Singapore
Democracy is Dangerous!
Singapore's Midlife Crisis
Smile, Singapore! WB and IMF Meetings a Scam
Chees' Rally & March; Interview with Gandhi Ambalam

worthy reads
xenoboy sg
students' sketchpad
singabloodypore
singapore mind
young republic
i-do-not-speak


friends
kwee boon
brendan
ben teh
2sa3
gecko

shameless advertising
if you're looking for air compressors and ancillary parts (vane, rotary, screw, etc), my dad sells them! ;)



disclaimer
the author of this site has based all her personal opinions on what is known to her as fact. any error is made of ignorance, not malice, and is accordingly apologized for. any views and opinions expressed by other persons on this site are not the responsibility of the author, nor does she claim to espouse them.

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed