Monday, May 01, 2006
More Election News

Mediacorp tonight was disgusting in its coverage of the Gomez incident.  First showing a PAP man asking for answers from James Gomez, answers to stupid questions like "Why did you need a lawyer to draft your apology statement?" (because if not, you'd sue him like you did all his colleagues, numbnuts), then the newscaster/commentator saying "But till now, there have been no answers...On the other hand, the PAP has been consistent since Day One with its message...With one opposition creating more questions than answers, and another with discord in its ranks..." Those were the snippets I could remember, because I didn't have my camera on hand to record everything with.  The bias in the news seems to be stepping up in the last few days leading up to Polling Day.  If you're wondering why, look at this:


PAP rally in Pasir Ris Park, 1st May, where I was at earlier.  According to my estimate, the crowd numbered in the hundreds.

Then look at this:


Workers' Party Rally at Hougang, on 30th April, which I attended last night.  Photo courtesy of gecko.

And this:


Alex Au of Yawning Bread estimates the crowd to be about 100 000-120 000 strong.

Honestly, if one were to predict the outcomes of the 2006 General Elections from the amount of interest generated by election rallies, then the Workers' Party and the SDP will be sharing a landslide victory this year.  Unfortunately, one can't afford the luxury of such prediction.  One would have to consider two sorts of people -- the type who hang around opposition election rallies, laugh and clap and cheer, then go home and vote in the PAP, and the type who stay at home, relying on Mediacorp for all their information.  The couch potatoes are key to an approaching PAP victory.

Well, I had originally intended for this entry to be solely on the proceedings of the PAP Rally, but I was distracted by the news.  On the subject of the rally, which concluded my weekend round in which I visited one rally each by the SDP, the WP and the PAP, I must say the PAP one was the most uninspiring.  The crowd milled around, some chatting in low undertones to one another.  The most exciting thing I saw all night was this:



I asked the girls if I could take a picture of them and one of them promptly said 'no', while the other gestured me to somewhere I could take a picture from without being able to capture any identifying features.

It was also hilarious when I found myself and the rest of the crowd being introduced to Comrade Lim, Comrade Low and Comrade Shanmugaratnam during my visit.  What's with all this communist allusion? The Red Guards referred to each other as 'comrades'.  Let's also not forget Comrade Lenin, Comrade Stalin, and our dear friend Comrade Mao.  Does anyone remember Lee Hsien Loong saying he wants to let 'one hundred flowers bloom' in Singapore during his first-ever rally speech? That too was part of Mao's vision for communist China, in letting a 'a hundred flowers bloom, a hundred schools of thought contend'.


Comrade Shanmugaratnam gets very excited while telling the crowd about the Outstanding Youth in Education Award (OYEA).  Oh Yea, baby.

I stayed to listen to Tharman Shanmugaratnam and Penny Low address the crowd.  Shanmugaratnam gave a predictable deluge of facts and statistics to illustrate how wonderful he's been at his job as Minister of Education, while Penny Low gave another barrage of examples which mostly had to do with widening roads and other upgrading projects with fancy acronyms.  One thing about Penny Low: she is one scary woman! She kept yelling at the crowd anti-SDA things, trying to rouse them up into some sort of fervour.  "SDA people in their trucks just go round and round and round! No direction! Round and round!"..."WHAT CAN THEY DO FOR YOU?!?", etc.  As far as I could see, only the core supporters near the stage would cheer here and there, while the rest seemed to stand silent and vaguely discomfited.  I'm very scared of her now :( I kept imagining her chasing after her kids with a rattan cane.

That's one part of a larger reason why I left early, during Low's speech.  The WP rally left me inspired, thoughtful, reflective, hopeful.  The PAP one left me afraid, uncomfortable, and out of place.  When the person I was with started to criticize Low, I couldn't help but look over my shoulder at the surrounding policemen in their neon green jackets, and wonder where the recording devices were.

Oh well.  Tomorrow I return to school, and I shan't be able to attend any more rallies for the rest of the week.  I'm grateful in many ways for this weekend and the chances it gave me to both celebrate the presence of democracy, in the wide open fields, and lament the absence of it in the four walls of my living room.

Posted at 10:19 pm by gaylegoh

idiot
May 30, 2006   05:49 PM PDT
 
You are great Gayle.
Charissa
May 4, 2006   12:37 AM PDT
 
well... there are bound to be people who will go overseas universities to study. I think NUS is not bad.... quite a few swedish i know say so too. Perhaps our wonderful government should encourage NUS to train some lecturers to speak better english..... err... and give us Singaporeans more spaces in the NUS!

I heard the same rumor about balakrishnan too! Perhaps he got invited to a tea party and was converted?
gayle
May 3, 2006   11:53 PM PDT
 
enhua- i heard tharman used to be some kind of dissident. but i heard the same thing about vivian balakrishnan. both ex acsian boys, no? i can't find anything on the net about either of them pre-PAP days though, so i'm not sure. judith told me about tharman, whereas when i was on some i-contact programme produced by channel i, the producer told us that balakrishnan used to be quite an outspoken activist against PAP single party rule. interesting.
Enhua
May 3, 2006   11:08 PM PDT
 
THARMAN'S GOING DOOOWN! ACSIAN(as if thats really that great anyway) OR NOT, HE'S GOING DOOOWN!
watch me!
gayle
May 3, 2006   11:15 AM PDT
 
joo chiat is damn rich. rich people vote with their wallets. i think it will go to the PAP for sure.

more unis.. nah i don't think we need more unis. better ones maybe :) NUS isn't as great as it would like to believe. not that it's not a decent university, but i think singaporean students deserve better, instead of having to go overseas all the time to ang moh niversities.
Charissa
May 3, 2006   01:46 AM PDT
 
One of the thing i did not like is how Perry tong talked about building more universities as if it can be done overnight. haha.... though i agree that the university criterias should be more lax allow Singaporeans of all ages and those that have gone through different channels of lower education.

Another thing is that i felt they should not raise the issue of the "New Poor" during their Joochiat rally. This is because Joochiat is 100% landed properties and so this issue affects them less.

I felt they did not have enough focus more on telling the joochiat residents what WP can do to help them.

That all i remember about what i did not like. i have to admit i am quite forgetful.
AvidFan
May 2, 2006   10:56 PM PDT
 
To answer your question: I'm a student who's waiting to start school overseas this Sept. Like you, I can't vote but I can't wait to vote. And I found your blog by way of happycitizen's blog. I guess all of us who are interested in Singapore politics are cross-referencing the same blogs :)
ac
May 2, 2006   10:28 PM PDT
 
I've never attended any rallies but I've attended the last 3 rallies of wp - fantastic! I'll continue to go on Wed, Thu and Fri. Each time I go, I ask different friends to go with me, haha!

Channelnewsia, ST and so forth are for the less adventurous amongst us!
gayle
May 2, 2006   03:55 PM PDT
 
the Economist had better start sending me their issues soon, as i paid up quite awhile ago already to a rather seedy looking salesman.

i'm also curious who you actually are, and if you know me from somewhere or just surfed in. it's always a bit odd to discover more people read this blog from more places than i thought.
AvidFan
May 2, 2006   03:18 PM PDT
 
Gayle, you've taken a more rational and positive approach while my response is chiefly emotive. I agree that the foreign news coverage and Review sections of ST are reasonably good, but most of the good articles are reprints from other newspapers or journals. So, I've subscribed to NYTimes (you only need register but don't need to pay) and read it daily. If I've more money, I shall subscribe to The Economist too. I realise how easy it is to wean myself from ST altogether :)
gayle
May 2, 2006   03:03 PM PDT
 
AF: I wouldn't stop my subscription of the ST, it's still useful for news on foreign affairs; the space it sets aside for experts' commentaries on global issues is actually quite informative. And monitoring its coverage of Singaporean politics is entertaining though frustrating. I think knowing where something is lacking, is key to pressing for change. Re: persuading others to vote opposition, yeah, I've been doing the same =p

Char- What kind of issues did they raise that you didn't agree with?
AvidFan
May 2, 2006   03:53 AM PDT
 
I've stopped watching the news or reading the papers. I've also stopped my subscription and asked others who are prepared to listen to stop their newspaper subscription as well. There are so many alternative sources of news as well as commentaries nowadays, including yours.

I've also attended the rallies and felt the electric atmosphere at WP ralles. Unfortunately, I won't be voting because there's a walkover in my GRC. But I do what I can to tell friends and relatives why, for the sake of Singapore's future, they should vote for the opposition.
Charissa
May 2, 2006   01:31 AM PDT
 
Haha.... you really went to attend a PAP rally? Manz.... by the sound of your description, I think i should attend it too to see for myself... I think i'll be the person at the back chuckling to myself.

I attended the WP rally at east coast today.... it was a huge crowd as usual.... i think about 20 000-30 000 people again? An that is even though it was raining oO . However, i have to say that i prefer their hougang rally yesterday. Reason being i dont quite agree with some arguments and suggestions made.

Nevertheless, some points made were really good....for example Mr Tan Wui-Hua's reply to PM if he can be a minister and Miss Slyvia Lim and Mr Low Thia Khiang pressing the PAP to ans the questions they rasied during the hougang rally eg. means testing for healthcare. I do hope PAP take some time off from their busy schedule in "making a mountain out of a molehill" and answer pertinent questions raised about our country's future.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments







Previous Entry Home Next Entry
gayle goh

<< May 2006 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

profile

Recommended Posts

Do We Owe Our Existence to the PAP?
A Message From a Media Insider
The Bilahari Kausikan Post
Bilahari Kausikan's Reply
Money in Politics, Politics in Money
Workers' Party, PAP or My Living Room Armchair?
My Vision for Singapore
Democracy is Dangerous!
Singapore's Midlife Crisis
Smile, Singapore! WB and IMF Meetings a Scam
Chees' Rally & March; Interview with Gandhi Ambalam

worthy reads
xenoboy sg
students' sketchpad
singabloodypore
singapore mind
young republic
i-do-not-speak


friends
kwee boon
brendan
ben teh
2sa3
gecko

shameless advertising
if you're looking for air compressors and ancillary parts (vane, rotary, screw, etc), my dad sells them! ;)



disclaimer
the author of this site has based all her personal opinions on what is known to her as fact. any error is made of ignorance, not malice, and is accordingly apologized for. any views and opinions expressed by other persons on this site are not the responsibility of the author, nor does she claim to espouse them.

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed